ICT25 / Use of generative AI in the application process

WWTF recognizes that the use of genAI tools is pervasive and can facilitate proposal writing, for example in relation to improving written language. However, substantial use[1]use of genAI must be declared as such for the sake of transparency. This mainly concerns the "work programme", which contains critical parts of scientific relevance, such as hypothesis formulation and the scientific project plan. WWTF also emphasizes the importance of human responsibility for the content submitted at all stages of the application process.
For your information, WWTF does not allow the use of genAI in the evalauation process.

[1] “Substantial use” is defined in line with the European Commission’s definition: “[…] using generative AI as a basic author support tool is not a substantial use. However, interpreting data analysis, carrying out a literature review, identifying research gaps, formulating research aims, developing hypotheses, etc. could have a substantial impact.” (EC 2024: Living Guidelines on the responsible use of generative AI in research.)  

This mainly concerns critical parts of scientific relevance, such as hypothesis formulation and the scientific project plan. WWTF also emphasizes the importance of human responsibility for the content submitted at all stages of the application process. For your information, WWTF does not allow the use of genAI in the evaluation process.