ESS26 - Resilience and Crises

ESS26 - Resilience & Crises / Key Facts & Events

ESS26 - Resilience & Crises / Key Facts & Events

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Key Facts

Scope of the Call in a Nutshell

This call invites researchers to submit proposals for exploratory, interdisciplinary research projects that advance the conceptualization of resilience in relation to selected crises—primarily with regard to their societal dimensions. The project must be led by a social scientist. Projects should initiate structured collaboration with other scientific disciplines and with relevant practitioner communities, and employ methodological approaches capable of anticipating potential future crises.

This call is part of a two-phase funding activity. Projects funded in phase one will be invited to submit a further project proposal for larger projects once the exploratory projects are concluded (see outlook at the end of this document). The call for phase two is expected in early 2028 once all projects of phase one have finished.    

Who can apply?
Project Duration

12-18 months

Funding
Timeline
Process
Matchmaking Platform

The Matchmaking Event took place on March 23, 2026. For the remainder of the call until the submission deadline, the Matchmaking platform is available to find potential project collaborators:  Please go to https://www.b2match.com/e/project-call-resilience-crises, register with you profile.

Past Events 

Call Info Session!

The Info Session provided an introduction to the call and the requirements for successfully submitting a proposal. WWTF will give a presentation, followed by a Q&A session. 

Date: April 24, 2026 , 10:00-12:00; online via Zoom

Download the Presentation: Slides - ESS26_InfoSession.pdf

Foresight Workshops

As part of the preparations for the WWTF call for proposals ´Resilience & Crises WWTF, in cooperation with Fraunhofer ISI, is offering two practice-oriented workshops on foresight methods in Vienna. The aim is to give potential applicants a sound introduction to the key concepts, approaches, and methods of strategic foresight and to support you in developing future-oriented project ideas. Participants will learn to explore key influencing factors of future resilience, identify signal of change, analyze and reflect on uncertainties, develop alternative future scenarios and derive needs for action and ideas for solutions. A special focus is placed on participatory methods, stakeholder involvement, and the derivation of robust options for action and governance strategies. The workshops combine conceptual input with practical exercises and provide space for exchange on concrete needs and examples in the context of resilience research.

Two workshops with the same content will take place on the following days at the WWTF, Schlickgasse 3, Top 8 / 1090 Wien: 

Wed, Apr 8, 2026, 13:00 - 16:00      

Thu, Apr 9, 2026, 09:00 - 12:00 

The workshop is intended to support researchers new to these methods. Participation is not mandatory in order to submit a proposal. Furthermore, the methods presented at the workshops are exemplary. Other methods may also be chosen for the proposal.

You can find the workshop materials by Simone Kimpeler of Fraunhofer ISI here: WWTF Foresight Workshop Kimpeler.pdf.

ESS26 - Resilience & Crises / Key Facts & Events

ESS26 - Resilience & Crises / Events

Call Info Session, April 24, 2026

The Info Session provided an introduction to the call and the requirements for successfully submitting a proposal. WWTF will give a presentation, followed by a Q&A session. 

Date: April 24, 2026 , 10:00-12:00; online via Zoom

Download the Presentation: Slides - ESS26_InfoSession.pdf

PAST EVENT: Foresight and Anticipation Workshops on April 8 & 9, 2026

As part of the preparations for the WWTF call for proposals ´Resilience & Crises WWTF, in cooperation with Fraunhofer ISI, is offering two practice-oriented workshops on foresight methods in Vienna. The aim is to give potential applicants a sound introduction to the key concepts, approaches, and methods of strategic foresight and to support you in developing future-oriented project ideas. Participants will learn to explore key influencing factors of future resilience, identify signal of change, analyze and reflect on uncertainties, develop alternative future scenarios and derive needs for action and ideas for solutions. A special focus is placed on participatory methods, stakeholder involvement, and the derivation of robust options for action and governance strategies. The workshops combine conceptual input with practical exercises and provide space for exchange on concrete needs and examples in the context of resilience research.

Two workshops with the same content will take place on the following days at the WWTF, Schlickgasse 3, Top 8 / 1090 Wien: 

Wed, Apr 8, 2026, 13:00 - 16:00      

Thu, Apr 9, 2026, 09:00 - 12:00 

The workshop is intended to support researchers new to these methods. Participation is not mandatory in order to submit a proposal. Furthermore, the methods presented at the workshops are exemplary. Other methods may also be chosen for the proposal.

You can find the workshop materials by Simone Kimpeler of Fraunhofer ISI here: WWTF Foresight Workshop Kimpeler.pdf

PAST EVENT: Matchmaking and Networking Event on March 23, 2026

The Matchmaking Event took place on March 23 with about 60 participants in the Albert Schweizer Haus.

Presentation of WWTF at the event: Resilience Matchmaking Event_webpage.pdf

While the event is over, the platform is still available for matchmaking. Please go to https://www.b2match.com/e/project-call-resilience-crises, register with you profile and find project partner.

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

This repository contains all the necessary information for the ESS26 - Resilience and Crises Project Call.

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Scope of the Call

Introduction and general scope of the call 
Societies are entering an era of increasing uncertainty where new crises emerge and familiar ones return in transformed, and probably even more damaging ways. There can be no return to the “good old times”: the past cannot be restored, nor the present preserved in its entirety. Yet many civilizational and democratic achievements remain worth safeguarding, even as crises demand new societal approaches and innovative solutions. In this context, resilience is not a fixed condition but an active practice—one that must be deliberately cultivated, continuously exercised, and critically refined. Social science research plays a crucial role in understanding these transformations and generating the knowledge, tools, and networks needed to strengthen societies’ capacity to respond, adapt, and thrive amidst uncertainty.
The objective of this call is to support exploratory, interdisciplinary research projects, led by social scientists, that advance the conceptualization of resilience in relation to selected crises—primarily with regard to their societal dimensions. Projects should initiate structured collaboration with other scientific disciplines and relevant practitioner communities, and employ methodological approaches capable of anticipating potential future crisis events.
This call is part of a two-phase funding activity. Projects funded in phase one will be invited to submit a further project proposal for larger projects once the exploratory projects are concluded.

Key Requirements 
Main aims of the call (including funding phase two)

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Outlook for funding phase two

Please consider the following aspects that will be crucial in funding phase two when writing the proposal for funding phase one. 

Applicants of this call are encouraged to take into account the main requirements for the second funding phase from the outset. In the first funding phase, up to 20 projects will be supported. These projects will then be invited to submit a proposal for continued funding, a selected sample will go into the second phase. 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Structure of the Call

This call follows a one-stage selection process. Please note that there will be a another application process for funding phase two. 

Proposal deadline: June 17, 2026, 2pm CET. 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Submission

Applications must be submitted via the WWTF Funding Portal. All application information will be processed via this system.

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Eligibility and roles of applicants

The general eligibility of applicants is specified in the WWTF Funding Guideline (in German only).

A project’s core team may include up to three Principal Investigators (PIs). This includes a PI&C and up to two co-PIs. 

A researcher may appear as a core team member (i.e., PI&C, co-PI) in a maximum of two proposals in this call. In case of three or more proposals with the same PI, WWTF will accept the first two proposals submitted. Involvement in other past / ongoing / granted WWTF projects does not impact upon eligibility to apply in this call.

One PI must be designated as PI&C (PI and coordinator).

Up to two co-PIs may also be named in the core team.

Additional project partners and collaborators are permitted in the research team. 

Research partners outside Vienna:

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Joint Projects with partners in Lower Austria

WWTF welcomes Joint Project (JP) applications between Viennese and Lower Austrian universities and research institutions in this call.

The aims of this initiative are to promote research cooperation between Lower Austria and Vienna on equal terms and to strengthen cooperation of research institutions in the Vienna region. 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Structure of the proposal

The content and structure of the proposal are defined and specified in the Submission Guideline as well as directly in the WWTF Funding Portal.

We encourage you to create a proposal in the Funding Portal to see the details of the proposal. By creating a proposal, you do not enter into any obligations toward WWTF. Incomplete and non-submitted proposals will be deleted after the call deadline.

For the proposal structure, please see "Details of Chapters".

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Evaluation criteria

The following criteria are used in the evaluation.

Main evaluation criteria

Projects that do not meet the key requirements regarding scope will be rejected by the jury, regardless of scientific quality. 

The key criteria in the evaluation of proposals are scientific excellence of the project and applicants and interdisciplinarity:

Further evaluation criteria

Other aspects:

Please note that the proposal will be evaluated by a jury panel, who will be asked to act as generalists when evaluating proposals. The proposal is intended for a jury panel with expertise covering a range of topics in the field of the social sciences. There will also be some jury members with a non-academic background (in order to assess the societal relevance and impact) as well as national jury members (in order to assess the relevance for the national context). 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Eligible costs

All costs that are directly attributable to the project and are regarded as commonly required in the respective scientific fields are eligible for funding. Please also consider your organization’s internal guidelines for eligible expenses/costs.

Personnel costs

WWTF is dedicated to funding researchers. Hence, the larger share of the project’s budget should be allocated to personnel costs for researchers working on the project.

Non-personnel costs

Running costs for basic infrastructure (telephone costs, rents) as well as costs for the acquisition of infrastructure and basic equipment are not eligible for funding, as these should be covered by the category “overhead costs”. The following categories of non-personnel costs are eligible for funding:

Non-personnel costs should not exceed 50% of the overall budget.

Indirect costs (overheads)

 WWTF pays a maximum of 20% overhead.

Overhead is calculated as a percentage of the direct costs of the project (i.e., personnel + non-personnel costs). Please note that WWTF offers the maximum 20% overhead lump sum to compensate for all administration costs. This means that flat fees for payroll or project accounting are not eligible. The total funding volume is calculated as direct plus indirect costs.

Applicants are required to comply with the overhead regulations of the involved institutions.

Please consider WWTF's Recognition of Costs in Funding Guidelines (in German only. Please use your preferable translation program to translate the guidelines into English). 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Gender aspects in the application phase

WWTF’s Gender Strategy and Gender Equality Plan must be considered throughout the application. Please regard WWTF's guidelines and instructions, in particular the chapter regarding the proposal phase. 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Guidelines for good scientific practice and ethics (incl. AI use in proposal writing)

Good scientific practice

Compliance with the rules for good scientific practice, including the observance of ethical aspects in research, is mandatory. This pertains to the application process and, in case of funding, the research work.

Use of AI in Proposal Writing

WWTF recognizes that the use of genAI tools is pervasive and can facilitate proposal writing, for example in relation to improving written language. However, substantial use of genAI must be declared as such for the sake of transparency. 

“Substantial use” is defined in line with the European Commission’s definition: “[…] using generative AI as a basic author support tool is not a substantial use. However, interpreting data analysis, carrying out a literature review, identifying research gaps, formulating research aims, developing hypotheses, etc. could have a substantial impact.” (EC 2024: Living Guidelines on the responsible use of generative AI in research.)  

This mainly concerns critical parts of scientific relevance, such as hypothesis formulation and the scientific project plan. Applicants will be required to provide statements on the use of generative AIs at both the short and full proposal stages. WWTF emphasizes the importance of human responsibility for the content submitted at all stages of the application process. 

In review and evaluation processes WWTF does not allow AI to be used for the actual formation of judgments and decision-making.

Ethical aspects

Project proposals may include ethical aspects that require the approval from an ethics committee/institutional review board. Please consider WWTF’s requirements regarding ethical aspects at the different stages of the call and, if applicable, upon the selection of a project for funding.

When in doubt, WWTF may require a verdict of an ethics committee even if the projects has identified no potential ethical issues regarding their proposed work. 

Please note that the feasibility of obtaining the required ethical approval will be considered during the evaluation of the proposal. Insufficient demonstration of the ability to obtain ethical approvals within a timely manner may result in the project being excluded by the jury panel.

Please note the following requirements regarding ethical approvals for WWTF-funded projects.

Non-compliance will result in the rejection of the proposal on formal grounds.

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Open Science

WWTF requires compliance with its Open Science Policy. This document outlines the rights, roles and responsibilities of WWTF, researchers, and research organizations.

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Selection and decision process

Applications must be submitted via the online Funding Portal in the specified timeframes. Submissions after the deadline will not be considered.

The core element of WWTF’s decision-making processes is an international jury mandated to make a funding recommendation to the WWTF boards. 

Formal eligibility check by WWTF

WWTF office will conduct a formal eligibility check of the proposal based on the criteria outlined in the WWTF Funding Guidelineand this document. This includes:

Substantial deficiencies and missing sections in the application will lead to the exclusion of the application from further evaluation and rejection on formal grounds. The strict timeline of the call does not allow for proposals to be sent back to the applicants for amendments.

Evaluation of the proposals

Jury meeting

The jury will convene about 3 months after the submission deadline to select full proposals to recommend for funding. The jury may be extended by additional members in case supplementary expertise is needed to cover the topics of the proposals. At least two jury members are assigned to each proposal and act as rapporteurs for the proposals.

Formal funding decision

The jury recommendation will be formally confirmed first by the WWTF Advisory Board and then approved by the WWTF Board of Directors.

Please note that WWTF does not allow the opportunity for rebuttals within this call to either recommendations by the jury panel or decisions by the WWTF Board of Directors.

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Call Specifications

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / In case of a positive funding decision ...

Conclusion of a Funding Contract

In case of funding, WWTF office will contact the PI&C to draw up the funding contract. 

A timely and mostly simultaneous start of the projects is necessary so that all projects are roughly in the same project phase when the application period for funding phase two starts. 

Monitoring and Reporting of Funded Projects

Funded teams commit themselves to delivering reports and participating in evaluation and monitoring. WWTF offers the possibility to adapt the work plan according to project needs. For details, see the Reporting and Accounting Guideline (in German only).

Please note that due to the short duration of the projects, there will only be one final report. 

Community Building

WWTF is highly committed to establish a community around the topic of this call. To this end, several community building activities will be offered throughout the funding cycle. Funded teams will be invited to participate in these activities to foster collaborations between and beyond WWTF funded projects. 

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Submission Guideline

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Submission Guideline

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Details of Chapters

Chapter "Basic Information"

This chapter contains basic information about the proposal, including title, scientific disciplines involved, keywords, duration, and type of project (i.e., regular WWTF Project or Joint Project). Fill out fields as required.

Please note:

Chapter "Personnel and Institutions"

This chapter contains information about the main parties in the project. Please see here how to invite PIs to the project. 

Before proceeding to the Chapter "Budget", please make sure that all PIs and CoPIs have been invited (and that they filled our the Profile and Role) and that all additional partner institutions are added. The Budget tool of the online form needs this information to allocate the cost lines to institutions. If this step has not been completed, the system might miscalculate the budget.  

Chapter "Project"

This chapter contains the main part of the scientific information regarding the project. 

Lay Summary
Abstract
Work Programme

The work programme comprises the following chapters:

1. Introduction and state-of-the-art

This section should outline the scientific background and current state of the art relevant to the proposed research. Applicants are expected to clearly demonstrate how the proposed topic addresses both scientifically and societally relevant questions within the scope of the call.
The proposal should explain the scientific importance of the chosen topic and articulate its relevance to societal challenges regarding resilience and crises. Applicants should justify the selection of the crisis or crises addressed, situating them within current scientific debates as well as broader societal needs and policy contexts.
Applicants are also expected to position their previous and ongoing work within the existing state of the art and to explain how this prior expertise underpins and informs the proposed work programme, demonstrating both continuity and added value beyond current knowledge (Please note that this call does not require applicants to be experts in crises or resilience studies; however, they should have expertise in the domain to which the chosen crisis relates to). 

2. Innovativeness and original contribution 

This section should identify the key scientific challenges and gaps in the existing body of research relevant to the proposed topic. Applicants are expected to clearly articulate how the project addresses these challenges and advances beyond the current state of knowledge.
The proposal should specify in which respects the project is innovative and novel, in particular regarding capacity building. The expected contribution of the research to the field should be made explicit. Given the nature of the funding (max. 100,000 € for a short-term funding period), a huge step is not expected.
Applicants should also briefly describe the interdisciplinary approach adopted in the project and explain how the combination of diverse disciplinary perspectives and expertise within the research team contributes to the project’s originality and innovative potential (see also subchapter 7). 
3. Conceptual considerations
This section should present the key conceptual/theoretical frameworks guiding the proposed research. Applicants should explain how these frameworks inform the analysis of the selected crisis or crises and address the main themes of the call, such as resilience and uncertainty.
The proposal should also outline the conceptual/theoretical basis for the project’s anticipatory aspects, including approaches such scenario building, and indicate how these support the analysis of future developments and uncertainties.
4. Research questions and objectives
This section should clearly and precisely define the research questions and objectives of the proposed project: Why are the selected crisis or crises suitable for the project? How will it be approached? Why are the chosen crisis or crises a suitable starting point for studying and strengthening societal resilience?
Furthermore, the proposal should explain how the research design enables the development of actionable, practice-oriented outcomes and how these are expected to generate tangible real-world impacts beyond academia (with a view on funding phase two).

5. Methodological approaches and workplan
Please provide a well-structured work plan (including work packages and key milestones). The work plan may also include a meaningful and self-explanatory visual representation. Include a description of the methodological approaches you aim to employ, in particular with regard to anticipatory approaches as well as how you aim to reach practitioners and how you aim to create and build networks both within academia and with societal actors. 

6. Expected outcomes and outlook for funding phase two 
Please explain what you intend to achieve with the project. What would be the potential next steps in case your project will be selected for phase two of the funding?

7. Project team and interdisciplinary collaboration
Describe how the project team collectively, based on their individual expertise and the disciplinary backgrounds, is able to achieve the overall goals of the proposed project. Describe the expertise and competences of the PI&C in the field of social sciences. Justify the disciplinary composition of the project team (in particular when both disciplines come from the social sciences). 
How is interdisciplinary collaboration organised within the project? Please ensure that this section is consistent with the information you have provided in the "Roles" section ("Specific scientific competences for the project" and "Roles and responsibilities within the project") in the online forms of the funding portal. 

8. References
The number of references is not limited. Please use a referencing style that is accepted by an interdisciplinary community. 

Formal requirements

Ethical considerations 
Use of generative AI

Chapter "Budget"

Please note the following guidelines for the budget:

Personnel costs

Make sure that all institutions are added before in the "Personnel and Institutions" chapter. Otherwise the system cannot assign additional persons to institutions and thus the budget overview is not correctly displayed. 

Non-personnel costs
Budget per region
Cost overview
Explanation of Cost Planning
Disclosure of other applications for funding

Chapter "Signatures"

ESS26 - Resilience and Crises / Support by WWTF office

WWTF aims to assist you in all matters regarding the submission process. If you do not find answers to your questions on these pages, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

You can usually reach us during normal office hours.